skip to content »

norilskmc.ru

Dating site for serious people

Even today, online dating is not universally seen as a positive activity—a significant minority of the public views online dating skeptically.

And this is especially true for those at the upper end of the socio-economic spectrum: Even as online daters have largely positive opinions of the process, many have had negative experiences using online dating.

Half (54%) of online daters have felt that someone else seriously misrepresented themselves in their profile.

Some 79% of online daters agree that online dating is a good way to meet people, and 70% of them agree that it helps people find a better romantic match because they have access to a wide range of potential partners.

Yet even some online daters view the process itself and the individuals they encounter on these sites somewhat negatively.

Some 22% of 25-34 year olds and 17% of 35-44 year olds are online daters.

No fake profiles, no spam, just real millionaires or admirers meeting other successful, attractive and available singles.If you still ask how to meet a rich man or where to meet rich men, here is the best answer for you!

dating site for serious people-26dating site for serious people-87

In general, online daters themselves give the experience high marks.Paid dating sites, and sites for people who are seeking partners with specific characteristics are popular with relatively large numbers of online daters: Organized outings are much less common, as just 4% of online daters have attended a group outing or other physical event organized by an online dating site.Additionally, 22% of online daters have asked someone to help them create or review their profile.And 38% of Americans who are single and actively looking for a partner have used online dating at one point or another.Compared with eight years ago, online daters in 2013 are more likely to actually go out on dates with the people they meet on these sites.That is statistically similar to the 17% of online daters who said that this had happened to them when we first asked this question in 2005.